Investigating Racial Bias Within Australian Rules Football Commentary

Similarly, Mitchell et al. found that up-and-coming Indigenous AFL players were discriminated against by being selected for recruitment purposes with lower-order draft picks compared to non-Indigenous players. This is despite the fact that Indigenous AFL players consistently outperformed their matched (i.e., same experience, same draft number, etc.) non-Indigenous peers . In contrast to these findings, Lenten analysed the number of Brownlow Medal votes given to Indigenous and non-Indigenous AFL players between 1998 and 2010. The Brownlow Medal is considered the most prestigious individual award in the AFL, and Lenten sought to examine the possibility of racial bias in the distribution of umpire votes. Surprisingly, results indicated that Indigenous players, on average, received 6.6% more umpire votes compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts .

United States

Secondly, this would allow for analysis of the possible mediating effects of a player’s height/size on the relationship between race and statements related to physical ability, and race and statements related to appearance. Alternatively, player height and/or size could simply be added as covariates within a regression analysis. Finally, it is important for future research to assess the impact of, and interaction between, race and gender within live sports commentary. Thus, the systematic analysis of Women’s AFL commentary warrants future study. The current study found no significant between race differences in the overall proportion of positive and negative statements, with 15% and 18% of statements being negative for White and non-White players, respectively.

Only a small number of studies have systematically examined racial bias within the context of AFL, revealing a potential bias against Indigenous players regarding playing time, playing position , and the AFL drafting process . Hallinan et al. found that, compared to White AFL players, Indigenous players were on average less likely yeubongda.site to be selected to play and were overrepresented in non-central field positions (i.e., playing on the wings or flanks of the game). Non-central field positions, as described by Hallinan et al. , often require the stereotypical talents of speed and agility and are viewed as less important positions requiring less responsibility.

Analysis Of American And British Commentary Of Football

In cases of big events, teams consisting of many sideline reporters are placed strategically so that the main commentator has many sources to turn to . In the United States, sideline reporters are heavily restricted by NFL rules; in contrast, both the 2001 and 2020 incarnations of the XFL featured sideline reporters in a much more prominent role. The term "color" refers to levity and insight provided by analyst. The most common format for a sports broadcast is to have an analyst/color commentator work alongside the main/play-by-play announcer. An example is NBC Sunday Night Football in the United States, which is called by color commentator Cris Collinsworth, a former NFL receiver, and play-by-play commentator Al Michaels, a professional announcer. In the United States, Pat Summerall, a former professional kicker, spent most of his broadcasting career as a play-by-play announcer.

Manchester United

The current study utilised an adequate sample size relative to most prior studies and had sufficient power. However, there is the possibility that small between-race effects (.10) exist and were undetected by the current study. The current study examined differences between the commentary contained on both of the networks on which AFL is televised (i.e., Fox Footy and Channel 7). Each AFL game generally involved rotating teams of four or five individual commentators, involving over 40 different commentators, across the two networks . However, only analysing the broad category of network did not allow for the assessment of possibly racially biased statements made by individual commentators.